[luci] [Olsr-users] LuCI or not LuCI ?

Henning Rogge hrogge at googlemail.com
Mon May 25 15:02:43 CEST 2009


Am Donnerstag 21 Mai 2009 14:44:48 schrieb mickey:
> Hello,
>
> L. Aaron Kaplan schrieb:
> > in case there are bugs, let us know.
>
> I have found an issue (which might be considered minor but it tickles me).
>
> Both current versions of the olsrd package in Kamikaze are not able to
> properly deal with the LinkQualityMult parameter when its specified more
> than once within the uci config. The startscript does not keep them all
> but only put the last one into the dynamicly created config file.
The most current stable (0.5.6) has a bugfix for "lqmult default ..." and we 
tested both settings (ip specific and the default one) on the WCW in Berlin...

Maybe you can test it with a selfcompiled version ?

Henning
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.subsignal.org/pipermail/luci/attachments/20090525/b9b01cd5/attachment.pgp 


More information about the luci mailing list